NEW DELHI: In a significant ruling that underscores the importance of transparent governance and emphasises the legal principle of ‘contra proferentem’, reinforcing the need for clear communication in administrative processes, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ( NCDRC ) has sided with a retired head constable from the para-military service , ordering Haryana govt to allocate him a residential plot in Hisar, in a decision that reverses a previous order of the state consumer commission.
Contra proferentem is a rule of contract interpretation that states that an ambiguous contract term should be construed against the drafter of the contract.
Retired personnel Naresh Kumar had got the plot of Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) through a draw under the reservation criteria for ex-servicemen in Feb 2014. But later govt cancelled the allotment citing that he did not fall in the category. Following this, Kumar challenged the cancellation of the plot in district consumer commission, which ruled in his favour. Yet, HUDA appealed to the state commission, which upheld the cancellation but ordered it to refund the earnest money with 12% interest.
Kumar contested the state commission’s ruling at NCDRC, arguing that he qualified as an ex-serviceman based on a HUDA circular specifying a 10% reservation for defence personnel and ex-servicemen, including those from paramilitary forces. HUDA contended that the draw brochure clearly delineated reservation categories and excluded paramilitary personnel from the ex-servicemen category.
Hearing the arguments, the NCDRC bench comprising members Sudip Ahluwalia and Rohit Kumar Singh bench referred to three documents available in public domain — HUDA brochure, letter of HUDA administrator of 1997 mentioning 10% quota for ex-servicemen and a subsequent letter of 1998 specifying 2% quota for paramilitary personnel.
The bench found that there was no explicit mention excluding retired paramilitary personnel from eligibility. It said that the state commission had failed to recognise that Kumar was not seeking special treatment but was entitled to the benefits outlined in the reservation criteria.
Passing the order for allotment of plot at the at of Feb 2014 when the original allotment was done, the NCDRC bench said, “The rule of contra proferentem is applicable in this case because the ambiguity and the consequent inadequate clarity has been created by the respondents and hence, the benefit of doubt is to be given to the petitioner on account of which they cannot unilaterally withdraw the allotment made by them to the petitioner.”
Contra proferentem is a rule of contract interpretation that states that an ambiguous contract term should be construed against the drafter of the contract.
Retired personnel Naresh Kumar had got the plot of Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) through a draw under the reservation criteria for ex-servicemen in Feb 2014. But later govt cancelled the allotment citing that he did not fall in the category. Following this, Kumar challenged the cancellation of the plot in district consumer commission, which ruled in his favour. Yet, HUDA appealed to the state commission, which upheld the cancellation but ordered it to refund the earnest money with 12% interest.
Kumar contested the state commission’s ruling at NCDRC, arguing that he qualified as an ex-serviceman based on a HUDA circular specifying a 10% reservation for defence personnel and ex-servicemen, including those from paramilitary forces. HUDA contended that the draw brochure clearly delineated reservation categories and excluded paramilitary personnel from the ex-servicemen category.
Hearing the arguments, the NCDRC bench comprising members Sudip Ahluwalia and Rohit Kumar Singh bench referred to three documents available in public domain — HUDA brochure, letter of HUDA administrator of 1997 mentioning 10% quota for ex-servicemen and a subsequent letter of 1998 specifying 2% quota for paramilitary personnel.
The bench found that there was no explicit mention excluding retired paramilitary personnel from eligibility. It said that the state commission had failed to recognise that Kumar was not seeking special treatment but was entitled to the benefits outlined in the reservation criteria.
Passing the order for allotment of plot at the at of Feb 2014 when the original allotment was done, the NCDRC bench said, “The rule of contra proferentem is applicable in this case because the ambiguity and the consequent inadequate clarity has been created by the respondents and hence, the benefit of doubt is to be given to the petitioner on account of which they cannot unilaterally withdraw the allotment made by them to the petitioner.”
You may also like
Conor McGregor's UFC return collapses as opponent he called out dashes fight plans
Muda chief, an aide of Sidda, quits citing health grounds
IndiaAI Mission Selects 8 Projects to Advance Ethical AI Development
Real Madrid step up Trent Alexander-Arnold interest with Liverpool star top of four-man list
Reece James update, midfield battle – Five things spotted in Chelsea training before Liverpool
Elon Musk donates $70m to Donald Trump election campaign because he wants a 'centrist' government
Stonehenge tunnel campaigners would have lost legal bid to scrap it, court says
Mumbai: NCDRC Orders Developer To Compensate ₹49.5 Lakh To Homebuyer For Denial Of Flat Possession After 75% Payment
Jake Paul plan for next fight after Mike Tyson becomes clear
Navi Mumbai: 19-Year-Old Business Management Student Loses ₹15 Lakh To Conman Promising Flat Near Vile Parle College; Case Registered
'BJP Has Surpassed It's Membership Drive Target', Says BJP State President VD Sharma
Mumbai: Airport Customs Seizes 1.72 Kg Smuggled Gold Worth ₹1.25 Crore; 2 Arrested In Major Operation
Prince William steps out in velvet suit and everyone is saying the same thing
Mumbai: BMC Announces 5% To 10% Water Cut Due To Vaitarna Pipeline Valve Breakdown On October 17-18
Strictly star pulls out of studio appearance as Janette Manrara explains absence
Thane: 49-Year-Old Woman Loses ₹10.35 Lakh In Online Task Fraud By Scammers Posing As Amazon HR On Telegram
Lions tear apart wildlife park worker inside cage in horror attack
MP To Play Important Role In Maharashtra, Jharkhand Polls
Older Brits to get £460 one-off payment by January 1 - how to claim
Murder In The Shadows: Investigation Reveals Sinister Conspiracy Behind Baba Siddique's Assassination And Zeeshan Akhtar's Plot