A federal court on Wednesday blocked US President Trump from imposing broad tariffs on imports under an emergency-powers law.
The ruling, issued by a three-judge panel at the US Court of International Trade in New York, came in response to several lawsuits that claimed Trump exceeded his authority and caused economic disruption by using emergency powers to direct US trade policy , reported AP.
Trump had imposed tariffs on most countries, arguing that the US trade deficit constituted a national emergency. He relied on the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify the tariffs, which targeted goods from countries including Canada, China, and Mexico.
His administration claimed the move was necessary to combat illegal immigration and the flow of drugs into the US.
However, the seven lawsuits challenging the tariffs argue that the law does not permit the use of tariffs and that trade deficits do not meet the law’s requirement of an "unusual and extraordinary threat." The US has run a trade deficit for 49 consecutive years.
Trump’s administration contends that the courts upheld the then-President Richard Nixon’s use of emergency tariffs in 1971 and argues that only Congress, not the courts, has the authority to decide whether a president’s emergency declaration meets legal standards.
Trump’s tariffs shook global markets and raised concerns about US economic growth, though economists say the overall impact appears to have been limited.
The White House did not comment on the ruling, but the Trump administration is expected to appeal.
The ruling, issued by a three-judge panel at the US Court of International Trade in New York, came in response to several lawsuits that claimed Trump exceeded his authority and caused economic disruption by using emergency powers to direct US trade policy , reported AP.
Trump had imposed tariffs on most countries, arguing that the US trade deficit constituted a national emergency. He relied on the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify the tariffs, which targeted goods from countries including Canada, China, and Mexico.
His administration claimed the move was necessary to combat illegal immigration and the flow of drugs into the US.
However, the seven lawsuits challenging the tariffs argue that the law does not permit the use of tariffs and that trade deficits do not meet the law’s requirement of an "unusual and extraordinary threat." The US has run a trade deficit for 49 consecutive years.
Trump’s administration contends that the courts upheld the then-President Richard Nixon’s use of emergency tariffs in 1971 and argues that only Congress, not the courts, has the authority to decide whether a president’s emergency declaration meets legal standards.
Trump’s tariffs shook global markets and raised concerns about US economic growth, though economists say the overall impact appears to have been limited.
The White House did not comment on the ruling, but the Trump administration is expected to appeal.
You may also like
Indian-origin Anjali Sud elected to Harvard Board amid clash with Trump, will replace Canada PM Mark Carney
EastEnders fans 'work out' what's next for Zack Hudson as they uncover forgotten storyline
4 women deliver under phone torchlight in UP; probe ordered
Prince Harry 'upset' after Diana's sisters say Meghan had nothing 'in common' with her
Transfers spur 1 more Sidda-DKS turf war